Support for Advocacy and Training to Health Initiative
Action Research Center of Anusandhan trust
Support for Advocacy and Training to Health Initiative
Action Research Center of Anusandhan trust
Physicians or their qualified assistants are required to provide adequate information about your illness, its diagnosis (provisional or confirmed, as it may be), proposed investigation and possible complications to the patient. If the patient is not in a state to understand this, the physician or their assistant is required to provide the information to the caretaker.
This has to be done in a simple language that the patient or caretaker will understand.
Apart from this, patients have the right to know the identity and professional status of every doctor and assistant as well as the primary doctor who is treating them. Information regarding costs of treatment needs to be given in writing.
Patients or their respective caretakers have the right to access the originals or copies of case papers, indoor patient records and investigation reports. Investigation reports have to be made available to them within 24 hours of admission or 72 hours of discharge. The hospital is responsible for providing a discharge summary or a death summary, in the case of a death, to the caretakers or kin of the patient with original copies of investigations.
In an emergency situation, you can avail medical care in any government or private hospital. Under Article 21 of the Constitution, which ensures that every person has the right to life and personal liberty, you have the right to prompt emergency care by doctors without compromise on quality or safety and without having to pay full or an advanced fee to the hospital.
If a hospital decides upon carrying an invasive investigation or surgery or chemotherapy on a patient, they require to do so after completing an appropriate policy procedure. The doctor primarily in charge of a patient has to explain the risks, consequences and procedure of the investigation or surgery in detail and a simple language before providing the protocol consent form to the patient or to the responsible caretaker.
Now this one is a fairly known right, especially if you follow TV shows about hospitals or doctors. The code of ethics dictates doctors to hold information about the illness and treatment plan for the patient in strict confidentiality from everyone except the patient and their caretakers.
Unless it is an exceptional case where sharing this information is “in the interest of protecting other or due to public health considerations.” In the case of a female patient, she has the right to demand the presence of another woman if the medical practitioner checking or treating her is male. Having said this, the hospital is responsible for upholding the dignity of every patient, irrespective of their gender.
The above point brings us to the rights of a patient being upheld
without discrimination based on their illness, condition, HIV status or
on their gender, age, religion, caste, ethnicity, sexual orientation,
linguistic or geographical or social origins.
Based on the above characteristics, no person can be subjected to
discriminatory treatment, and the staff of the hospital is responsible
for ensuring this.
Here is a brief list of provisions that come under the list of quality care
standards-
Hospital staff and doctors are responsible for clarifying all treatment
options to the patient/caretakers. After a thorough study of their
choices, the patient/caretakers can choose to opt for a treatment that
may or may not be the doctor’s primary recommendation. This also
means that once the patient/caretakers choose this alternative
treatment, they will shoulder the responsibility of its consequences
Doctors and the hospital must respect your decision if you choose to
seek a second opinion from a doctor/hospital of your choice. They are
responsible for handing over all record documents and other relevant
information should you choose to approach a different doctor. The
hospital can neither stop you nor discourage you from going
elsewhere, only give a detailed explanation of the health condition and
repercussions in case of delay in treatment.
In case you choose to come back to the first hospital after getting your
second opinion, the hospital still cannot compromise on the quality of
healthcare services.
As mentioned above, the patient has the right to have a written
account of the costs they will have to bear for the treatment they are
receiving. As evidence for this, hospitals are required to have printed
brochures and prominent display boards bearing the names and rates
of medical procedures that are available with them. Detailed
schedules of key rates need to be displayed in conspicuous places and
need to be in both, English as well as the local language.
Patients have the right to get medicines, devices and implants at rates
decided by the National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA) and
other relevant authorities. Patients have the right to receive health
care services that cost within the range prescribed by the Central and
State governments, at the time of receiving it.
As a patient or a caretaker, you have the right to choose which
registered pharmacy you wish to buy your medical supplies from. This
also includes getting an investigation procedure (like a blood test, for
example) from any diagnostic centre or laboratory registered under
the National Accreditation Board for Laboratories (NABL).
If a patient must be transferred from one healthcare centre to another,
a proper and detailed justification must be given to them/caretakers
along with various options of the new healthcare centre. They must
also be given a list of treatments/medicines that need to be continued
after the transfer. This step cannot be taken unless the patient or their
caretaker accept it.
Needless to say, these decisions cannot be influenced by reasons like
“kickbacks, commissions, incentives, or other perverse business
practices.”
According to the MoHFW, “All clinical trials must be conducted in
compliance with the protocols and Good Clinical Practice Guidelines
issued by Services, Govt. of India as well as all applicable statutory
provisions of Amended Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and Rules,
1945 Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation, Directorate
General of Health.” These points include consent by the patient,
written prescription of drugs or intervention, privacy etc.
In case a patient is involved in a biomedical or health research
procedure, their consent needs to be taken in a written format. Their
right to dignity, privacy and confidentiality needs to be upheld even
during the research. If the participant suffers direct physical,
psychological, social, legal or economic harm, they are eligible for
financial or other assistance by the hospital.
Whatever benefits the hospital gets from the research must be made
available to relevant individuals, communities and the general
population.
“A patient has the right to be discharged and cannot be detained in a
hospital, on procedural grounds such as [a] dispute in payment of
hospital charges. Similarly, caretakers have the right to the dead body
of a patient who had been treated in a hospital, and the dead body
cannot be detailed on procedural grounds, including nonpayment/dispute regarding payment of hospital charges against
wishes of the caretakers,” says the MoHFW
Here is a list of things that a patient needs to be informed about by the
hospital. These need to be addressed in the language that the
patient/caretaker understands.
Last but not the least, every patient has the right to address his
grievances and give feedback about the healthcare and treatment they
received at the hospital or from a particular doctor/assistant.
The MoHFW further adds, ” Patients and caregivers have the right to
seek redressal in case they are aggrieved, on account of infringement
of any of the above-mentioned rights in this charter. This may be done
by lodging a complaint with an official designated for this purpose by
the hospital/healthcare provider and further with an official
mechanism constituted by the government such as Patients’ rights
Tribunal Forum or Clinical establishments regulatory authority as the
case may be.
Orignal Source: https://www.thebetterindia.com/158829/patient-right-hospital-law/
Citizens groups, consumer organisations and health rights networks
across India should demand the implementation of the Patients’
Rights Charter in all hospitals.
The MoHFW should include the entire set of 17 patients’ rights, as
outlined in the NHRC Patient Rights Charter in the standards related
to Central Clinical Establishments Act (CEA); this would ensure that all
healthcare facilities in 11 states, which have adopted this Act, will
observe patients’ rights
dhananjay.kakade@sathicehat.org
Dr. Dhananjay Kakade has 18 years of professional experience at the global and the national level in the development sector. He has worked as a trainer, researcher, campaigner, organiser, manager and grant-maker, focusing on social accountability, governance, and human rights.
Dr. Dhananjay has worked with civil society organisations and funding agencies to safeguard human rights and promote people’s participation in health decision-making. From 2004 to 2012, he worked with SATHI- CEHAT- Pune as a Senior Program Officer and Associate Coordinator and worked with Oxfam India as a Health Coordinator from 2013 to 2014. He has worked in the Public Health Program of the Open Society Foundations, New York, from 2015 to 2018. Before joining Open Society Foundations, he served as the Executive Director of the National Center for Advocacy Studies in India from 2014 to 2015. In his last assignment, he has worked with the Asia Pacific Regional Office (South Asia) of Open Society Foundations and was based in London.
Sharda Mahalle is a graduate in science. She has been associated with SATHI since last twenty years. She is centrally involved in the execution of the project activities including data entry, IEC material, Awareness material, tool development, transcription etc.
Shweta Marathe is a Health Systems researcher with an academic background in hospital and healthcare management. With a decade-long experience in SATHI, she is keen to undertake action-oriented research that actively supports advocacy efforts for a better health system. She had been a KEYSTONE fellow under the Alliance for Health Policy and System Research program. Her research interests focus on the functioning of the public health system and transformations in the private healthcare sector. Her recent research work includes collaborative research projects with King’s College, London and the Accountability Research Centre, American University. Currently, she is a fellow of the India-HPSR fellowship cohort 2022.
Hemraj Patil has a degree of Masters in social work (Community development) and 13 years’ experience working in the public health sector. For the last 9 years he has been working with SATHI, on Community-based Monitoring and planning of Health Services and Decentralized Health Planning. Currently he coordinates with rural organizations in 17 districts, for public participation in health services, right to health and social audit. He has vast experience in liasoning with state level administrations, departments and officials.
Bhausaheb Aher is a post-graduate in social work from Karve Institute of Social Services, Pune University. He has twenty-two years of experience in the development field. For the past 10 years, as part of his work in SATHI, he has been centrally involved in district and state-level training on Health Rights and the Right to Health Care, Community action for nutrition and the social audit process of multi-sectorial services in Maharashtra. He has also written articles in the Marathi language in different newspapers and magazines on the above issues. He anchors the Media and ICT programme, preparing video documentary on various topics/themes for the organization and designing of tools, reports, posters, Sticker, Calendar, booklet and other types of training and advocacy materials for the project.
Shakuntala has been with SATHI for 14 years. Starting with training initiatives for ASHA workers in rural and tribal areas, she engaged in various advocacy activities in collaboration with civil society organisations. Her work in SATHI helped her understand health rights and advocacy, and her experience on the ground sharpened her interventions. In addition to working for the public health system, she has also been involved in advocacy efforts for the accountability of the private sector. Currently, she coordinates the SATHI’s work on Patient rights initiative to ensure health services reach the poor patients and their health rights are protected.
Trupti Malti is a post-graduate in Sociology from Pune University, with twenty years of experience in the development field. She has been associated with SATHI since last twelve years, and is presently working as program in-charge for public health program. She has good managerial as well as analytical skills, which have enabled her in the execution of project activities including developing strategies, questionnaires and analysing data as per requirements of the projects. She has played a key role in training component of the projects as well as developing the resource materials. She is involved in health budget analysis and multi sectoral social audits process in Maharashtra. She has written articles on various issues related to health rights and health budgets in the local media.
Dr. Abhay Shukla, is Senior Programme Coordinator in SATHI and has been with SATHI right from its inception in 1998. He is a public health physician with postgraduation degrees from AIIMS, New Delhi and has been actively engaged in health rights work since last three decades. He has guided multiple action and research projects since its conceptualisation to analytical writing. He has been the principal investigator for various research projects. He has been persistently contributing to wide canvas of public health areas like strengthening of public health system, community nutrition, social regulation of the private healthcare sector and Universal Health Care. He is member of various networks including National Co-Convener, Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (People’s Health Movement – India), Global Steering Committee, Community of Practitioners on Accountability and Social Action in Health (COPASAH) and Alliance of Doctors for Ethical Healthcare (ADEH). He also serves as a member on government committees including National Health Mission – Advisory Group for Community Action (AGCA), Core group on Health, National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and State Mentoring Committee, National Health Mission, Maharashtra. Along with authoring scientific papers, books and reports, he also writes prolifically on issues of public health and accountability for mainstream media.
Thank you for your message. It has been sent.