Support for Advocacy and Training to Health Initiative
Action Research Center of Anusandhan trust
Support for Advocacy and Training to Health Initiative
Action Research Center of Anusandhan trust
Project Title: : Assessing and Explaining the Impact of Community Based Monitoring and Planning (CBMP) across Multiple Contexts in the State of Maharashtra
Project Period: October 2017 to June 2020
The Community Based Monitoring and Planning (CBMP) initiative in India has been implemented since 2007 as a component of National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) and later through National Health Mission (NHM). This CBMP intervention, which is a significant form of social accountability of health services, has completed eleven years in Maharashtra state in 2018. The study is being undertaken to examine the impact of CBMP, by analysing various aspects of the CBMP process and its influence on the interface between community health system and communities which access healthcare.
Objectives of the Study
This study uses a mixed methods approach, utilising a paired comparative case study (CCS) design including quantitative survey. Paired CCS would further use secondary and primary data which would be both qualitative and quantitative in nature. Five pairs of cases are selected from CBMP and non-CBMP areas using most similar type of case selection method. Paired CCS includes- qualitative in-depth interviews of key stakeholders and quantitative survey with women who have delivered in public health facilities during last six months. This component is augmented with quantitative Survey of RKS and VHNSC Members across CBMP and non- CBMP blocks.
Project Title: Practices, Regulation and Accountability in the Evolving Private Healthcare Sector: Lessons from Maharashtra State, India’
Project Period: July, 2017 to June 2019
Background:
This project is a two-year collaborative study, being conducted by researchers from SATHI Pune and King’s College London, and supported by Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council/UKAID/ESRC, UK under their Joint Health Systems Research Initiative Foundation Grant 2017.
The Corporatisation and Regulation in the Private Healthcare Sector in India (CRiPS) is concerned with the expansion and transformation of the formal private sector hospital care and related diagnostic services in India, through an organised, and increasingly transnational, healthcare industry; the regulatory and accountability challenges arising from such changes; and how these can be addressed to improve regulation and social accountability. It will do so through a detailed case study of these developments in Maharashtra. This will be used to inform future advocacy for health rights and development of regulatory policy in the move towards universal health coverage. The study is informed by social policy literature on commercialisation and market relationships in production and provision of healthcare; on issues of power and role of special interest groups in processes of regulation; and on social accountability-social regulation-governance approaches to re-invent and democratise regulation.
The specific research objectives are:
Project Title: Promotional Practices of Pharmaceutical Industry and Implementation Status of Related Regulatory Codes in India
Project Period: August 2017 to August 2019
Over the past decade, the Medical Council of India, pharmaceutical Companies and the government have constituted regulatory codes to guide the interaction of medical professionals with the pharmaceutical and allied health sector industries, and to curb unethical promotional practices. These are voluntary codes and anecdotal experience reveals that often these codes are not adhered to. To understand this, a detailed documentation of field level promotional practices of the pharma industry was undertaken with the specific objective of studying its promotional and marketing practices in India and the implementation status of the regulatory codes. The study is qualitative in nature, using purposive and snowball sampling method. 50 In-depth interviews have been undertaken with various key informants in six selected cities across the country. The study primarily focuses on interviewing medical representatives because they are the ones who promote the drugs on actual field to health care professionals. Analysis indicates that several unethical promotional practices continue to exist such as incentives in kind, in cash, sponsorships for attending conferences and sponsored entertainment trips too. Along with these new forms such as providing gift cards (Debit Cards), petro cards, e-vouchers, online purchasing on Amazon, Flipkart etc. have emerged as a new phenomenon. It indicates that even though there are regulatory codes such practices continue to exist and there has been no stringent action been taken to curb the unethical practices which prove the ineffectiveness of voluntary codes.
Project Title: Project-Understanding the Perspective of Medical Practitioners about Commission Practice in Private Healthcare in India (APPI)
Project Period: January 2016 to March 2017
Expansion of private sector has undoubtedly increased availability and physical access to health services; however, the private health sector is also plagued with certain unethical practices. Unethical practices like unnecessary prescriptions, procedures, and diagnostic tests are discussed anecdotally. Weak regulation of private health sector, lack of monitoring mechanisms and absence of standard treatment protocols have been identified as some of the reasons behind the rise in such unethical practices. Commission practice (splitting professional fees) is one of such unethical practices of which Medical Council of India has taken note of. Despite the clear guidelines by Medical Council of India, commission practice has thrived unscrupulously. Given the dearth of research on private health sector in India, it is important to bring on board the views of private practitioners regarding the nature of commission practice in India. In this context, this study attempts to study the perspectives of radiologists and pathologists in Pune city regarding the commission practice, about its impact on health care providers and also the ways to check this practice. It is a qualitative research study which explored the views of doctors from two different specialties, viz., pathology and radiology. These two branches were chosen since these branches are mostly dependent on the patients referred by other doctors. Total 20 In depth interviews were conducted in the study.
This study has proved that the anecdotal experience of many that the commission practice in the branches of Pathology and Radiology in the city of Pune in India is a well-entrenched practice. The commission practice has become a norm and private doctors look at commission practice as a menace but not as a moral dilemma. Nearly everyone agrees that it is difficult for a new entrant in business to survive if s/he refuses to give commission, the declining moral fabric of society has already shaped world views of doctors.
Project Title: Promoting participatory action on local Health budgets and medicine distribution in Maharashtra (IBP)
Project Period: 1st June 2014- 31st July 2016
Writing research paper on Community-based Monitoring Process in Maharashtra
The objective of the research is to critically analyse community-based monitoring and planning (CBMP) related to health services in Maharashtra as a way to foster ‘publicness’, to evaluate the potential for scaling up such initiatives in India, as well as for transferability on a global scale. The study is based on secondary research to be carried out in Maharashtra state of India. It will focus on CBMP in relation with accountability, improving access to public health services, enhancing responsiveness of services and reducing out-of-pocket expenditures of people accessing public health services.
First, it will provide international context and theory about Community monitoring of public health services, locating CBMP in Maharashtra in this context. Second, it will identify key successes and problems related to CBMP in public health services in Maharashtra, drawing upon external evaluations and SATHI experiences. Finally, it will draw out key lessons from the Maharashtra CBMP experience which might be relevant for similar accountability work in other settings, including health sector in other countries and other social services.
Project Title: Assessing Usefulness of Participatory Audit and Planning Process on Improving Functioning of Patient Welfare Committees in Select Public Health institutes from Maharashtra
Project Period: 2013-2015
Community empowerment is being increasingly recognised as a critical component towards enhancing accountability of and equitable access to health care. In India, a participatory process termed ‘Social audit’ has emerged as an effective model for ensuring accountability and equity in the Employment Guarantee scheme. In Maharashtra, a group of Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), implementing Community-Based Monitoring and Planning (CBMP) of health services under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) since 2007, considered Rogi Kalyan Samities (RKS, Patient Welfare Committees) as an important gateway to ensure effective and equitable utilisation of flexible funds under what is now the Nation Health Mission (NHM), and initiated a Participatory Audit and Planning (PAP) process.
Retaining the core of social audit with appropriate modifications in the context of RKS funds, a PAP was conducted in 9 health facilities from three tribal districts of Maharashtra between December 2014 and March 2015. In a preparatory phase, RKS expenditure data of the year 2013–2014 were analysed and public report cards were prepared. The PAP then involved examination of financial documents, physical verification of purchases and report cards. Multiple stakeholders (RKS members, elected representatives, health providers and CSO actors) were involved in the process. Eventually, in a dialogue among key stakeholders, identified issues would be discussed, decisions taken and future planning done accordingly.
Project Title: A Study of Supplementary Nutrition For Under 3 Children In Four Districts Of Maharashtra (NSF)
Project Period: 2012-15
Under the ICDS programme, supplementary nutrition in the form of hot cooked meals is provided to children in the age group 3-6 years while ‘Take Home Ration’ (THR) packets are provided to children aged less than 3 years. The present study was carried out with the objective of assessing two different strategies used for providing supplementary nutrition for under-3 children provided through ICDS scheme. These two strategies are giving THR packets vs. giving cooked food to the children. The comparison was done to see the differences in the distribution, consumption, and nutritional value of food provided through THR versus cooked food. Data were gathered through interviews of caretakers of under three children, direct observation of food preparation and records from Anganwadi. It was seen that, only 11% children in the THR districts were frequent users of the packaged food. In the overall analysis cooked food for children below 3 years was found to be better strategy of providing supplementary nutrition than THR packets due to better acceptability, consumption and adequacy of calorie and protein content (actual consumption). The study indicates that the government should make appropriate modifications to improve the efficacy of the Take Home Ration scheme.
Project Title: Complementary Feeding Practices amongst Children Aged 6-18 Months in Tribal Parts of Maharashtra, India – Requires to be Complemented Aptly (NSF)
Project Period: 2012-15
The link between malnutrition and child feeding practices has been widely recognised. Late introduction of weaning food by Indian mothers is a well-documented fact and is considered to be a major cause of malnutrition. In India, breastfeeding in rural areas appears to be shaped by the beliefs of a community, which are further influenced by social, cultural, and economic factors. Breastfeeding and weaning practices vary among different regions and communities. Hence, continuous vigilance over infant feeding practices in the community is necessary for timely interventions, to ensure optimal growth and development. The present study was carried out to document the complementary feeding practices in the view of understanding reasons of delayed or deficient practices in children aged six-18 months, from tribal regions of Maharashtra. It was a descriptive, cross sectional study conducted during February 2015- October 2015 in selected blocks from three tribal districts of Maharashtra viz: Amravati, Gadchiroli and Nandurbar. The overall picture indicates that although a majority of mothers were unaware regarding appropriate feeding practices for meeting the child’s nutritional requirements. Top feeding practices are found to be deficient in terms of under feeding and lack of nutritionally balanced diet in the studied children.
Project Title: Developing capacities for using community oriented evidence towards Strengthening District Health Planning in Maharashtra State, India (WHO)
Project Period: April 2010- September 2012
Health sector policy making in India has been highly centralised with little use of community based evidence. In principle, Government is committed to the decentralisation of power and thereby allows people to have greater say in the process of decision making. Since Districts have distinct context and specific needs as far as health care is concerned, District Health Planning is a necessary component of decentralisation. Activities and strategies mentioned in this proposal are to build capacities of key stakeholders who would be involved in the process of decentralised planning by using community based evidence as well evidence from other sources such as Health Management Information System.
Project Title: Maharashtra Health Equity and Rights Watch & Research and advocacy on aspects of access and rationality of health services and Universal access to health care; Health rights and equity fellowship programme (IDRC)
Project Period: April 2011 – January 2015
The activities in this project are in continuation of the research activities conducted in the first phase. This project uses a three pronged strategy to develop work on health equity in the state. The three complementary approaches are –
The activities in the second phase are as follows –
One of the important activities of the project is a fellowship programme was to help build the capacity of young professionals. The focus of the fellowship programme was on Health rights and equity.
Project Title : A Study of budgetary provisions, procurement and supply system concerning essential medicines in selected districts of Maharashtra (IBP)
Project Period: August 2009 – March 2012
Research Component
Availability of essential medicines in public health facilities is one of the serious concerns regarding the quality of health care services. This is also one of the major reasons for lower utilisation of the public health system. Some amount of evidence is already available to substantiate this fact including preliminary findings of the household survey conducted by SATHI. For example in the 60th round of National Sample Survey (2004), information was sought regarding the medical expenditure for treatment under different heads of treatment during stay at hospitals as an inpatient. Analysis of this data reveals that the range of proportion of total expenditure on medicines was from 57 to 66. The proportion of expenditure on medicines to total expenditure is higher in the public health facilities as compared to private health facilities. This clearly indicates that though the public health facilities are supposed to provide the health care services at minimal costs, due to non availability of essential medicines in these facilities, the actual costs borne by the patients are very high.
Project objectives: To improve the availability of essential medicines in PHCs
Short term objectives
Key research areas in this project are
Activities
To know more about international budget partnership (IBP) and their partnership initiative click on http://www.internationalbudget.org/
dhananjay.kakade@sathicehat.org
Dr. Dhananjay Kakade has 18 years of professional experience at the global and the national level in the development sector. He has worked as a trainer, researcher, campaigner, organiser, manager and grant-maker, focusing on social accountability, governance, and human rights.
Dr. Dhananjay has worked with civil society organisations and funding agencies to safeguard human rights and promote people’s participation in health decision-making. From 2004 to 2012, he worked with SATHI- CEHAT- Pune as a Senior Program Officer and Associate Coordinator and worked with Oxfam India as a Health Coordinator from 2013 to 2014. He has worked in the Public Health Program of the Open Society Foundations, New York, from 2015 to 2018. Before joining Open Society Foundations, he served as the Executive Director of the National Center for Advocacy Studies in India from 2014 to 2015. In his last assignment, he has worked with the Asia Pacific Regional Office (South Asia) of Open Society Foundations and was based in London.
Sharda Mahalle is a graduate in science. She has been associated with SATHI since last twenty years. She is centrally involved in the execution of the project activities including data entry, IEC material, Awareness material, tool development, transcription etc.
Shweta Marathe is a Health Systems researcher with an academic background in hospital and healthcare management. With a decade-long experience in SATHI, she is keen to undertake action-oriented research that actively supports advocacy efforts for a better health system. She had been a KEYSTONE fellow under the Alliance for Health Policy and System Research program. Her research interests focus on the functioning of the public health system and transformations in the private healthcare sector. Her recent research work includes collaborative research projects with King’s College, London and the Accountability Research Centre, American University. Currently, she is a fellow of the India-HPSR fellowship cohort 2022.
Hemraj Patil has a degree of Masters in social work (Community development) and 13 years’ experience working in the public health sector. For the last 9 years he has been working with SATHI, on Community-based Monitoring and planning of Health Services and Decentralized Health Planning. Currently he coordinates with rural organizations in 17 districts, for public participation in health services, right to health and social audit. He has vast experience in liasoning with state level administrations, departments and officials.
Bhausaheb Aher is a post-graduate in social work from Karve Institute of Social Services, Pune University. He has twenty-two years of experience in the development field. For the past 10 years, as part of his work in SATHI, he has been centrally involved in district and state-level training on Health Rights and the Right to Health Care, Community action for nutrition and the social audit process of multi-sectorial services in Maharashtra. He has also written articles in the Marathi language in different newspapers and magazines on the above issues. He anchors the Media and ICT programme, preparing video documentary on various topics/themes for the organization and designing of tools, reports, posters, Sticker, Calendar, booklet and other types of training and advocacy materials for the project.
Shakuntala has been with SATHI for 14 years. Starting with training initiatives for ASHA workers in rural and tribal areas, she engaged in various advocacy activities in collaboration with civil society organisations. Her work in SATHI helped her understand health rights and advocacy, and her experience on the ground sharpened her interventions. In addition to working for the public health system, she has also been involved in advocacy efforts for the accountability of the private sector. Currently, she coordinates the SATHI’s work on Patient rights initiative to ensure health services reach the poor patients and their health rights are protected.
Trupti Malti is a post-graduate in Sociology from Pune University, with twenty years of experience in the development field. She has been associated with SATHI since last twelve years, and is presently working as program in-charge for public health program. She has good managerial as well as analytical skills, which have enabled her in the execution of project activities including developing strategies, questionnaires and analysing data as per requirements of the projects. She has played a key role in training component of the projects as well as developing the resource materials. She is involved in health budget analysis and multi sectoral social audits process in Maharashtra. She has written articles on various issues related to health rights and health budgets in the local media.
Dr. Abhay Shukla, is Senior Programme Coordinator in SATHI and has been with SATHI right from its inception in 1998. He is a public health physician with postgraduation degrees from AIIMS, New Delhi and has been actively engaged in health rights work since last three decades. He has guided multiple action and research projects since its conceptualisation to analytical writing. He has been the principal investigator for various research projects. He has been persistently contributing to wide canvas of public health areas like strengthening of public health system, community nutrition, social regulation of the private healthcare sector and Universal Health Care. He is member of various networks including National Co-Convener, Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (People’s Health Movement – India), Global Steering Committee, Community of Practitioners on Accountability and Social Action in Health (COPASAH) and Alliance of Doctors for Ethical Healthcare (ADEH). He also serves as a member on government committees including National Health Mission – Advisory Group for Community Action (AGCA), Core group on Health, National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and State Mentoring Committee, National Health Mission, Maharashtra. Along with authoring scientific papers, books and reports, he also writes prolifically on issues of public health and accountability for mainstream media.
Thank you for your message. It has been sent.